geplaatst
I am using OMS now since quite a few months . Besides many positive points I can come up with, I also have negative criticts, mainly on the consumption of resources by OMS and its' stability. But what I am mainly interested in now, is what you want to achieve with OMS. Is it something you write 'for yourself', to practise your skills, or do you have bigger plans. By the way, do you expect this Forum to be in English or Dutch?
Berichten: 27 | Geregistreerd: Jul 2002
| IP: Gelogd |
What the purpose of OMS is? Actually to perfect my skill and see what I can do for now. If you have some ideas, just drop it here.
-------------------- People are like pieces of a puzzle. We all fit together, but not all of us connect. Berichten: 6985 | Plaats: Zeist | Geregistreerd: Jul 2002
| IP: Gelogd |
geplaatst
My tip is to: - let the memory consumption drop. - build in checks in for the 'canvas', in the case that the requested memory is not available.
I'm affraid that is out of my hands. I have developed it in C++ Builder, and I have no control over the memory management.
quote: - build in checks in for the 'canvas', in the case that the requested memory is not available.
Same issue here. The canvas error, are coming from the default c++ vcl's. Maybe a fix from Borland will help?
-------------------- People are like pieces of a puzzle. We all fit together, but not all of us connect. Berichten: 6985 | Plaats: Zeist | Geregistreerd: Jul 2002
| IP: Gelogd |
-------------------- People are like pieces of a puzzle. We all fit together, but not all of us connect. Berichten: 6985 | Plaats: Zeist | Geregistreerd: Jul 2002
| IP: Gelogd |
geplaatst
It just sounds like: You are "only" using ready-to-use buildig blocks, made by 3rd parties (Borland, and others), and features and limitations fully depend on that. In other words, that you don't have (much) influence on the architecture of OMS.
Berichten: 27 | Geregistreerd: Jul 2002
| IP: Gelogd |
quote: In other words, that you don't have (much) influence on the architecture of OMS.
That's not entirely true. You must split the OMS Architecture in two platforms. The OMS Network (Webservices, PERL, Apache HTTP) and the OMS Clients. Everyone can write an oms Client. I have decided to write my OMS windows client in C++ Builder. It has the easy for me to use a lot of precompiled building blocks. It was never my intention to create a platform unindependent CLIENT. The server is the open architectur, and is the real power of OMS
-------------------- People are like pieces of a puzzle. We all fit together, but not all of us connect. Berichten: 6985 | Plaats: Zeist | Geregistreerd: Jul 2002
| IP: Gelogd |
geplaatst
To put your mind at ease. When I have finished the OMS 2.0 network, I will concentrate about the oms 3.0 client. I hope I can fix a lot of the problems and issues there. You just have to be a little patient.
-------------------- People are like pieces of a puzzle. We all fit together, but not all of us connect. Berichten: 6985 | Plaats: Zeist | Geregistreerd: Jul 2002
| IP: Gelogd |
-------------------- People are like pieces of a puzzle. We all fit together, but not all of us connect. Berichten: 6985 | Plaats: Zeist | Geregistreerd: Jul 2002
| IP: Gelogd |
geplaatst
Maybe you can rethink your priorities! Maybe from a technical point of view, it is most interesting for you to work on the Network now. But the Network is doing it's work correctly and speed is also not an issue. What I think we, the users of OMS, want, is a new version of the OMS Client! Are there users who support this view?
Berichten: 27 | Geregistreerd: Jul 2002
| IP: Gelogd |